Boy I tell you it is just sickening to listen to the liberals on the West Side in Los Angeles or on the Cape in Massachusetts. It is frightful to hear the bizarre innuendoes against the President of the United States in NYC and the San Francisco Bay area. Even worse are the radical nut cases in Oregon and the know it alls in Merry Land as they condemn the President for just about everything but his good looks. Probably because John Kerry is only slightly better looking that Abraham Lincoln on a bad hair day. Listen to this hateful comment;

This guy is the most pathetic as well as the worst president our country hasn't elected.

This is a matter of opinion, yours is clearly jaded, I am not saying irrelevant, just perhaps a little extra liberal slant and selective reading. Not good or bad. I am on the other side of this debate that is all. Human politics are interesting. Now then I believe the question at hand is:

Should we stand by and let US Troops die from Iranian insurgency in Iraq and Should the fanatical regime of Iran be allowed to sponsor international terrorism and have nuclear weapons.

Because as I see it, it does not matter if Hillary Clinton is in the White House working on streamlining health care and budget issues, this Iranian issue is a priority and something must be done. Standing around and denying it will not fix the problem; will it? The liberals would have you believe we should not intervene and allow Iran to have nuclear weapons even though everyone knows that they are a nation states which sponsors international terrorism. Consider this in 2006 you liberals.

Lance Winslow

Currently Lance is retired at age 40 and is running an Online Think Tank Forum while traveling North America. Perhaps considering something extremely challenging to do that will exercise his mind and utilize all his experiences, observations and skills. Any ideas?